Home / Compare / PointHuddle vs Async Poker

PointHuddle vs Async Poker

Async Poker is built for estimating without a meeting: people vote in Jira in their own time and explain their card. PointHuddle is built for the live session, with voting windows when the team can’t meet.

Price and limits

PointHuddleAsync Poker
Main modeLive rounds, plus voting windows with a deadlineAsync first, with written reasoning
Who can voteAnyone with the room link, no accountPeople signed in to your Jira site
Free tierEverything, up to 200 people per roomUp to 10 Jira users
Paid priceNone$0.85 per user a month for 11–100 users; about $850 a year for 100 users, through Atlassian
Reasons for a card“Why so far apart?”: the lowest and highest voters write one line after a live revealWritten reasoning with each async vote
NudgesSlack and Microsoft Teams channel posts: window opened, one reminder, results readySlack and email nudges
AIExperimental suggestion from a model on our own serverRovo AI insight
SecurityPassword rooms stored encrypted; no accounts, so no SSO; no SOC 2 (details)SOC 2 Type 2

Async Poker details from its Marketplace listing and the Marketplace pricing API, checked on 12 October 2026.

What PointHuddle adds after the reveal

Where Async Poker is stronger

Which one fits

Try it with your team

Create a room, share the link, and vote. No accounts, no sign-up, free.

Start a planning poker room